An argument in favor of effective gun control legislation

This fallacy is the reverse of the Fallacy of Accident. It is mightier than the mightiest weapon of destruction devised by the ingenuity of man. Like the armarium urguentum in its time, this view is widely accepted among public health professionals of this time. Further, this time they are using good statistics, and there is not a significant correlation between gun ownership and non-gun-homicide rate.

Gun politics in the United States

It would also prevent a much larger number of suicides. But to make sure that it remains free, that users can do what they like with it, we must place a license on it to make sure that will always be freely redistributable.

Of the many inhuman outrages of this present year, the only case where the proposed lynching did not occur, was where the men armed themselves … and prevented it. Furthermore, even after adjusting for confounders it finds in several age categories that higher gun ownership rates are correlated with higher non-gun homicide rates eg the rates at which people are murdered by knives or crowbars or whatever at p less than 0.

Guns And States

I think we should have this discussion honestly. That is, in areas having greatest restrictions on private firearms ownership, crime rates are typically higher, because criminals are aware that their intended victims are less likely to have the means with which to defend themselves.

One need only examine the first persons arrested under the Massachusetts and New York City "mandatory penalty" laws for proof that such laws are misdirected: That leaves, Washington 2.

Silly me for asking.

Gun violence

It is so vague that it could mean just about anything. Many of these reported homicides 1, were self-defense or justifiable and, therefore, not criminal. The sale or transfer of a firearm to a person younger than 21 years of age may not be made or facilitated by a licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, or licensed dealer.

The first one was deeply flawed, but the second one turned out to be okay. I am not trying to fight all the evils of the world.

Guns are neither magic talismans against tyranny nor anathematic objects that cause crime and violence. We think the time has come for Americans to tell the truth about guns.

In the current gun rights debate, one does not have to think too hard to catch the tiny little fact that anti-gun-rights liberals, besides not really being pacifists, are not really proposing to eliminate guns at all. Andrew goes on to complain: It is not our desire to participate in violence, but it is even less our desire to lose.

Moore called for more aggressive police patrolling in public places, saying: It is doing this by the increasing, and increasingly aggressive and obvious, unequal application of money, laws, political power, and armed force.

God only knows what Andrew would have done, if through bad luck he had accidentally gotten it into his head that transgender people are bad. Yes, as long as the young working-class men and women driving the tanks and shooting the really fully automatic weapons on its behalf keep doing so, the Imperial High Command may be able to crush everything from sporadic uprisings to a massive popular rebellion.

And that has corresponded to spectacular successes of the specific causes liberals like to push, like feminism, civil rights, gay marriage, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. And whatever-you-want-to-call-it is back — unless you think a regime that practices assassination, unilateral war-making, unlimited surveillance, austerity imposition, and issues from a completely corrupt electoral process, etc.

This makes some intuitive sense. This compares to justifiable homicides by police. It is the whole people The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms.

In Favor of Niceness, Community, and Civilization

And here is a graph of guns vs. Reading the underlined portion of the Statute Take, for example, this gem:: But consider the following: Hence any government official who is revealed to be a homosexual will lose his job.

He is not a heathen, he is a heretic. Yet all liberal gun-control schemes remain blithely indifferent to, when not aggressively dismissive of, these concerns.Gun politics is an area of American politics defined by two opposing groups advocating for tighter gun control on the one hand and gun rights on the other.

These groups often disagree on the interpretation of laws and court cases related to firearms as well as about the effects of firearms regulation on crime and public safety. I’m guessing you meant to write: “I am a pro-choice atheist. When I lived in Ireland, one of my friends was a pro-life Christian.” instead of.

Ricochet: Confessions of a Gun Lobbyist [Richard Feldman] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Ricochet Confessions Of A Gun Lobbyist Ricochet tells the truth.

With each page I can hear the echo of footsteps down the Rayburn Building's marbled halls as Feldman tells the intimate story few know and even fewer survive. >—Jack Brooks (D-Tex.). An Argument for Gun Control - America is the most well armed nation in the world, with American citizens owning about million of the world’s million firearms (Marshall).

Comprehensive and meticulously documented facts about gun control. Learn about ownership rates, crime, background checks, accidents, politics, and more. Ten Myths About "Gun Control" "We will never fully solve our nation's horrific problem of gun violence unless we ban the manufacture and sale of handguns and semi-automatic assault weapons.".

An argument in favor of effective gun control legislation
Rated 5/5 based on 26 review