In contrast, anti-tobacco campaigns have drastically reduced tobacco use through science-based education and restrictions on use and advertisement.
Drug use is dangerous to persons besides the user, in the rise of health care costs, violence associated with the use of drugs, neglect of children by drug-addicted parents, and other third party effects. The War on Drugs does have clear and obvious harmful effects on third parties.
Obesity is a national epidemic, killing millions every year, but the government has no right to regulate how much citizens eat. Legal or not, people will continue to use drugs. Education and harm reduction strategies are much more effective ways to reduce the dangers of drugs than prohibition.
The easy availability of drugs would create new consumers rather than rescuing current ones. Nor can they disseminate themselves from drug taking. It is possible to quit using any drug. Critics of the War on Drugs advocate the partial or complete decriminalization of illegal drugs, combined with a system of regulation, as happens with alcohol and prescription drugs.
Prohibition must be weighed against the loss of personal freedom.
Merchants who legally sell alcohol and tobacco are not allowed to sell to children. Recreational drug has no clear and obvious harmful effect on anyone besides the user who chooses to accept those risks. The judicial system did not accept, at first, that being arrested in possession of drugs was a tax violation because it must have come from an unlicensed source because there were no licensesthereby avoiding taxes.
There is no clear and obvious third party harm. Blanket prohibition was not the intention. The immorality of marijuana use can only be based on one set of moral beliefs.
By providing legal supplies of currently illegal drugs the price will fall, leading to a collapse in the illegal drug industry, and a reduction in crimes committed by both drug suppliers and users. The War on Drugs serves the immediate interests of politicians. Hydroponic Marijuana — Grow unbelievable buds, which means you need to smoke less for a sensational stoned feeling.
Legalization would allow greater regulation. If drugs were legalized, the companies that manufacture and market them would be sued, such as cigarette companies have been exposed to lawsuits.
More than four decades of the War on Drugs has systematically criminalized certain populations while doing very little to reduce violent crime.
For example, driving while intoxicated is illegal, while drinking alcohol without driving is not. Marijuana Tea — A great way to consume your greens in a lovely drink. The people who were allowed to issue the licenses did not do so, effectively banning the drugs.
There was some legal wrangling over the issue after it was passed. A State cannot be involved with the distribution of substances considered immoral by relevant lots of the population.
There is no doubt that drugs can be dangerous, but that is not a valid reason to make them illegal. The use of soft drugs, such as marijuana, leads to the use of hard drugs the Gateway Theory.
The biggest risk to a teenager who chooses to use drugs is not addictionbut being caught and introduced to the criminal justice system. Cigarettes come with warnings. From a blanket prohibition suppressing all use, to permitting certain amounts for personal use, the legalization of marijuana fights different fights in different countries.
Thus, the federal government did have the right to regulate the ingestion of drugs. Legalizing drugs will send a message to children that drug use is acceptable. Drug users exercise free will when they chose to use drugs; a person has the right to give up his or her own freedom.There's arguably no industry in the U.S.
that's growing at a faster, more consistent pace than legal marijuana. Marijuana Business Daily 's latest report, "Marijuana Business Factbook ," predicts legal sales growth in the U.S.
of 30% this year, 45% inand % as an aggregate between and to about a $17 billion market. An Argumentative Essay on the Use of Marijuana in Medicine.
There are still many arguments in favor of the use of medical marijuana. Elders () expressed that evidence of the benefits of cannabis was overwhelming, and that it should be used for medicinal purposes.
Documents Similar To An Argumentative Essay on the Use of Marijuana 5/5(8). Need writing favor of legalizing marijuana essay? Use our custom writing services or get access to database of 32 free essays samples about favor of legalizing marijuana.
Signup now and have "A+" grades! Most arguments in favor of prohibition don’t pass the smell test anymore, yet some of the more entrenched positions remain. Here is some perspective on these arguments, and why they’re plain wrong.
“The argument in favor of legalizing marijuana for recreational use relies on the false assumption ” Speaking of assumptions, you seem to have assumed that: 1) There was a good reason for the.
Drug use is dangerous to persons besides the user, in the rise of health care costs, violence associated with the use of drugs, neglect of children by drug-addicted parents, and other third party effects.
The use of soft drugs, such as marijuana, leads to the use of hard drugs (the Gateway Theory).Download