Analysis of ek ruka hua faisla essay

He is the first to question the evidence that is brought forward. Looking to some other Active-Destructive personality Mr. In this movie we observe few active personalities, amongst one who was the initiator for the discussion.

In the movie we find Mr. He stipulates his points through empirical evidence and eventually sways the other jurors. These personalities are bias by nature and at times the personalized approach leads to destructive behavior.

He stood out due to his ethics, motives, passion for fair and just hearing, and rational approach. Subiraj was also a perfect example. He was highly influenced by majority.

Written below are the various benefits of teams, observed: Que 3 Describe the major attributes, style and approach of the main protagonist in the film.

After the strategy of discussion was implemented, the person who was handling and controlling the committee organized the entire discussion. This will indeed make the team an effective medium of change. He approaches the trial in a very logical and organized manner. There was no intention to discuss the case in the committee, but this initiator planned this strategy accordingly and the strategy led to discussion.

A welcoming and supporting environment i. In this movie 12 jury members are appointed by the court to discuss the case and reach to a consensus about the final decision of the case.

Other active members supported the initiative taken by that individual. Thus, coming to the conclusion of the movie we saw that a person with active constructive personality is always a good leader and we saw various other personalities and other management fundaments used in this movie.

He kept giving his arguments and tried to re-consider all the facts related to the case and many jurors started taking interest in his arguments. Those who are not able to understand the complexity of the trial, are distracted and pressed for time tend to take the peripheral route.

The central route is the process by which a person carefully ponders upon a communication and is eventually influenced by the power of argument.

Juror 10 and 7 display this kind of an approach. Active-destructive are those people who have their original active ideas but supported by destructive behavior.

Route selection is another component of relevance in the movie. He was interrupted by most of the jurors as some of them were in a hurry. Raina is the best suited example for this personality.

We observed that there was one person who was disagree initially with the decision because the proof for the decision making was not satisfactory to him.

The main aspect that is highlighted is how our mental models influence our data selection, understanding and actions. Juror 8 and Juror 4, both follow this approach towards attitudinal change.Analysis Of: EK RUKA HUA FAISLA The main characters are: And hence I have distinguished them in the following manner: b) Punishing Parent (PP) Adult Ego State (AES) Child Ego State b) Adaptive Child (AC) I also used OBSERVED BEHAVIOURS to categorize the characters in the following manner: Active Active Constructive (AC’).

Ek Ruka Hua Faisla: Power Of Communication Ek Ruka Hua Faisla is a movie about 19 years old boy who was a suspect for murder of his father. There was a committee of 12 people assigned to decide whether boy was culprit or not.

HRM ASSIGNMENT. Analysis Of: EK RUKA HUA FAISLA SUBMITTED BY-JOBIN ABRAHAM He tries hard to keep up with the group.

Ek Ruka Hua Faisla

Juror 1 (Deepak Kejriwal) is the appointed foreman of the group who attempts to keep the deliberation orderly and procedural. in which all the members have to participate to reach a common conclusion. Ek Ruka Hua Faisla “Persuasion—convincing strangers to consider new perspectives, new insights, new goals—is a fundamental, challenging task of leadership because it requires a deep investment of personal character, mental stamina, and a capacity for emotional insight perfectly balanced with the ability to reason.

PLOT SUMMARY Ek Ruka Hua Faisla is an adaptation of 12 Angry Men (), which was directed by Sidney Lumet and was nominated for 3 Oscars. It also was another 13 awards and was nominated for 6.

Essay Example: Analysis of Ek Ruka Hua Faisla 1

Power Of Communication Ek Ruka Hua Faisla is a movie about 19 years old boy who was a suspect for murder of his father. There was a committee of 12 people assigned to decide whether boy was culprit or not.

Analysis of ek ruka hua faisla essay
Rated 5/5 based on 60 review