A garage owner, who simmers with anger, bitterness, racism; nasty, intolerant; needs the support of others to reinforce his angry outbursts. Though it has a variety of valid forms, they all share one characteristic: All eleven jurors, except one Juror 8 voted guilty.
So when it is his turn to talk he passes to hear the others before he makes the wrong assumption. To gain a deeper understanding of each man, we have listed them, and a few specific characteristics that stood out: The varying personalities and degrees of moral fortitude is evident from their reactions.
The old man Juror 9 displayed a supportive style. They did not want to put forth any extra effort in making this decision.
The Psychodynamic Approach seemed to be the choice for juror 2. Juror 6 is a salesman, who is impatient, opinionated, and rude.
Pp Facicone P. We felt that Juror 6 displayed a Style Approach to leadership, particularly an Authority Compliance style. Juror 8 was also a good listener and this could have also earned him so much respect.
Juror 1 appeared to be a natural leader. This was very evident in the fact that he simply wanted to find the boy guilty because he had baseball tickets for that night. He keeps jurors on task and centered on the focus of arriving at either a guilty or not-guilty verdict.
In the beginning, certain traits, such as his aggressiveness or persuasiveness, may have identified juror 8 as a leader. He does not care what anyone has to say. He was very compassionate, and showed high regard for others as stated earlier.
This then creates new options and processes for the group to explore. The burden of proof is the most difficult in law it is beyond a reasonable doubt, and Juror 8 who through reason and logic, who sees through the fallacies and falsehoods created by those in the room, who sows the seeds of doubt through the analysis and synthesis of the evidence provided, leads the group to a single conclusion.
All of these were displayed by juror 1, which helped them from declaring the case a miss-trail because a unanimous vote could not be reached.
Boston Wadsworth Cottrell, S. Twelve Angry Men Analysis Kelsey Crooks Principles of Sociology Professor Lori Sharpe October 19, Twelve Angry Men Analysis Sociology is “the systematic study of social interaction at a variety of levels” and can be observed in everyday life situations, including the one portrayed in the movie “Twelve Angry Men” (Benokraitis, ).
Twelve Angry Men Plot Summary A teenaged Hispanic boy has just been tried for the murder of his father, and the case is now in the hands of the jury. A guilty verdict will send the boy to the electric chair.
Essay Leadership Analysis “Twelve Angry Men”. Free 12 angry men papers, essays, and research papers. My Account. Your search Free Essays. Good Essays. Better Essays.
Stronger Essays. Powerful Essays. Term Papers. Research Papers.
Analysis of 12 Angry Men - In viewing 12 Angry Men, we see face to face exactly what man really is capable of being. Demonstrations of Leadership in.
Documents Similar To 12 Angry Men leadership analysis. Skip carousel. 12 angry men. Uploaded by. comela1. 12 Angry Men Notes. Uploaded by. 12 Angry Men Character Analysis Essay. Uploaded by. IxHeartxWAR. Twelve Angry Men. Uploaded by. Priyank Joshi. 12 Angry Men.
Uploaded by. Jozef Delvaux. 12 Angry Men1. Leadership Analysis “Twelve Angry Men” Olu Adewumi NCLC Prof. Ampthor The movie “Twelve Angry Men” is about twelve male jurors, brought together in a.
The jury of twelve angry men, entrusted with the power to send an uneducated, teenaged Puerto Rican, tenement-dwelling boy to the electric chair for killing.Download