Speaking English, they might argue, does not guarantee humanity in the eyes of individuals or — perhaps more importantly — systems. These days, the numbers are similar. We wear the masks we think other people want to see While Ebonics might be a perfectly intelligible form of English to those who speak it, it goes against the grain of a white-dominated society in which belonging means talking the talk of Standard English.
Such programmes offer a strong rejoinder to the absolutist stance of English-only advocates such as Mujica, who struck a heavy-handed chord during his most recent Congressional testimony, saying in his slow Chilean drawl: If the English language were under threat, matters might be different.
The troublesome example of official French policy in Quebec offers a cautionary tale One promising avenue for integrating non-speakers comes in the form of bilingual immersion education.
It was also irrelevant to the world of employment, so adopting it in the classroom essentially doomed students to lives in the poor neighbourhoods where they grew up.
Being able to communicate in English with police officers, for instance, has not kept young black males from filling the rosters of the US penal complex.
Such thinking feeds directly into a more basic question of US identity: In other words, the other who speaks like me is more likely to win my favour than the other who compounds his otherness by speaking other than me.
The question however is too simplistic: In truth, for many English-only advocates, language has become a stand-in for less palatable sentiments, the fear of changing racial demographics among them.
Immigrants to the US who cannot or will not learn to speak English are necessarily isolated from their English-speaking fellows.
Language is a national identity, to be preserved and protected, generally by the expulsion of others. Here as elsewhere, people who are isolated by language tend — much like poor people, or victims of sexual assault, for example — to get blamed for their condition.
To the extent that America has a national culture, it has been shaped by elements that immigrants brought with them. The tactic is neither new nor particularly subtle.
One prerequisite of being an American, as we have seen, is the ability to speak English.Essay on Should English Be Official? Words | 3 Pages “Should English be declared the official language of the United States?” is still a controversy - refighting the same old sociolinguistic issue of the s.
Many people believe that English should be the official language because we are American, and Americans speak English. Dec 31, · Why English should be the official language of the United States former mayor of Miami has declared that there is no need for Spanish speakers to learn English.
English is not our official. Making English an Official Language Essay 1” For English Rachel Should English be declared the official language of the United States? IV. Rough Draft. In the ’s by recognizing the historical fact.
Pros of English as Official United States’ Language Although lawmakers in the United States have lingered on deciding on endowing English with a special legal status, it was assumed that a common language would develop in America. The question that has been around for hundreds of years: “Should English be declared the official language of the United States?” is still a controversy - refighting the same old sociolinguistic issue of the s.
this essay will argue [tags: Language ] Strong Essays words | ( pages) | Preview. A push for English to be the official language of the US has both a dark history and a regressive vision for the future Aeon email newsletters are issued by the not-for-profit, registered charity Aeon Media Group Ltd (Australian Business Number 80 ).
have now declared English their only official language and in both.Download